Reciprocity Without Reality: A Response to Professor. Dze-Ngwa’s Open Letter. Why his call for “inclusive dialogue” risks managing the conflict rather than resolving it
Professor Willibroad Dze-Ngwa, your letter calls for peace. That objective is not in dispute. What is in dispute is the structure through which that peace is pursued. Because peace is not determined by intention. It is determined by process. By Timothy Enongene Guest Editor-in-Chief The Independentist News Professor Willibroad Dze-Ngwa, your recent open letter—issued in


PEACE WITHOUT DIALOGUE IS SHAMEFUL — BUT WHO PAYS THE PRICE? When moral truth collides with political power, Ambazonia confronts the danger of “managed peace” and the urgency of real negotiation
The question now is whether that truth will remain a statement—or become a process. Because if dialogue is necessary, then its absence is no longer procedural. It is consequential. And in conflicts of this scale, consequences do not disappear. They accumulate—politically, morally, and historically. By Ali Dan Ismael, Editor-in-Chief, The Independentist News There are moments