The Vice-President proposal is not a reform plan. It is a signal. A signal that the political architects of Yaoundé understand the fragility of the system they built — but still lack the courage to confront the deeper historical question that haunts the state. Instead of addressing the origins of the crisis, they offer symbolism. Instead of structural change, they offer titles. Instead of reconciliation, they offer choreography.
By Ali Dan Ismael
Editor-in-Chief, The Independentistnews
In the theater of African political absurdity, the regime in Yaoundé has unveiled its latest act: the resurrection of a Vice-President of the Republic through a hurried constitutional revision.
The francophone press presents it as reform. The regime presents it as “linguistic equilibrium.” The reality is far less flattering. It is a desperate political deodorant sprayed on a collapsing system. A Cosmetic Fix for a Structural Collapse
According to the draft circulating in the press, the Presidency would now include: The President, a Vice-President, a Secretary-General, a Deputy Secretary-General
The propaganda surrounding this proposal suggests the Vice-President will ensure “balance” between Cameroon’s English- and French-speaking populations, a claim that collapses faster than a house built on swamp mud.
A Vice-President does not restore constitutional legitimacy. It does not repair decades of political exclusion. And it certainly does not erase a war that has already reshaped the political geography of the region. You cannot bandage a severed limb with a ribbon.
The Real Motive: Elite Survival
Let us not pretend this proposal emerged from a sudden concern for fairness. The truth is painfully obvious. After more than forty years of rule, the regime faces the question that every authoritarian system eventually fears: What happens when the ruler disappears?
The Vice-Presidential office is not about reform. It is about controlling succession. It is a mechanism designed to keep power circulating inside the same political aristocracy that has ruled Cameroon like a private estate for four decades. The constitution is simply being remodeled to secure the next occupant of the throne.
The Linguistic Deception
The regime now speaks solemnly of “linguistic balance.” This would be laughable if it were not tragic. For sixty years, the English-speaking territories have watched: their legal system diluted, their educational system undermined, their economic resources extracted, their political voice marginalized
Now, after villages have been burned and thousands have died, Yaoundé suddenly discovers the beauty of bilingual equilibrium. This is not reconciliation. It is political cynicism masquerading as reform.
The Forgotten History
The architects of this amendment hope the public has forgotten the inconvenient timeline. Southern Cameroons entered a federal arrangement in 1961 following a United Nations–supervised plebiscite.
That federal structure was: dismantled in 1972, erased in 1984, and replaced by a centralized system designed to consolidate power in Yaoundé. The destruction of that federation is not a footnote. It is the root of the present conflict.
Yet the same political establishment that destroyed the federation now proposes to solve the crisis with a Vice-President. This is not reform. It is historical amnesia disguised as statesmanship.
A Constitution That Cannot Reach the Ground
Even if this amendment passes tomorrow, it will change almost nothing on the ground. Why? Because constitutions are only meaningful when they reflect political reality. And the reality today is stark: Entire regions once governed from Yaoundé are now defined by a conflict that constitutional drafts cannot wish away.
A Vice-President will not reopen burned schools. A Vice-President will not rebuild destroyed villages. A Vice-President will not restore the trust that decades of repression have obliterated.
The Illusion of Control
Authoritarian systems often believe that rewriting constitutional clauses can stabilize a crumbling political order. History rarely agrees.
When regimes begin to redesign constitutions to protect themselves rather than serve the nation, the document ceases to be a social contract. It becomes a survival manual for the ruling class. And survival manuals rarely inspire national unity.
The Final Truth
The Vice-President proposal is not a reform plan. It is a signal. A signal that the political architects of Yaoundé understand the fragility of the system they built — but still lack the courage to confront the deeper historical question that haunts the state. Instead of addressing the origins of the crisis, they offer symbolism. Instead of structural change, they offer titles. Instead of reconciliation, they offer choreography.
But titles cannot silence history. And choreography cannot disguise collapse. When a state begins to decorate its constitution instead of repairing its foundations, it is not entering a new era of stability. It is announcing — quietly but unmistakably — that the old order is running out of time.
Ali Dan Ismael
Editor-in-Chief, The Independentistnews
Leave feedback about this