THE FINAL DIVORCE: STEERING CLEAR OF THE LRC POLITICAL CIRCUS

The journey ahead is likely to remain complex. Yet history suggests that societies which remain organised, reflective, and principled are better positioned to shape their destiny—whatever form that destiny may ultimately take.

By Timothy Enongene, Guest Editor-in-Chief, The Independentistnews
16 March 2026

The events of September 22 and October 1, 2017, were not merely days of protest; for many in Southern Cameroons, they symbolised a decisive psychological and political break from La République du Cameroun (LRC). They marked a turning point in how a significant portion of the population began to define its future and its relationship with the existing state structure.

Today, debates continue about participation in the 2026 electoral process. For some, engagement represents a pragmatic attempt to influence governance from within. For others, it is seen as a contradiction of the sacrifices already made and a return to a system they believe has historically marginalised their identity and aspirations. These competing perspectives reflect the broader struggle over strategy, legitimacy, and the meaning of political agency in times of crisis.

Many who reject electoral participation argue that the system itself is not malfunctioning but functioning as designed, and therefore cannot easily deliver the structural change they seek. From this standpoint, the conflict is not viewed as a routine political contest over representation or access to public office, but as a deeper struggle centred on survival, recognition, and self-determination.

History offers varied examples of how oppressed or marginalised groups have navigated such dilemmas. Some movements have chosen to engage institutions in order to reform them, while others have withdrawn participation to challenge their legitimacy. Both approaches carry risks and opportunities. The central question often becomes not only what tools to use, but when and how to use them effectively.

Education and political awareness remain critical in shaping these choices. As Nelson Mandela once observed, education can be a powerful instrument for social transformation. For communities facing prolonged uncertainty, informed reflection may be just as important as mobilisation. Understanding the implications of participation, boycott, negotiation, or resistance requires careful thought rather than purely emotional reactions.

Ultimately, the future of Southern Cameroons will be shaped by the collective decisions of its people. Whether through engagement, non-participation, dialogue, or alternative forms of political expression, the path forward will depend on unity of purpose, clarity of vision, and a commitment to dignity and peace.

For those who believe in non-participation, silence on election day may be intended as a political statement. For others, participation may be viewed as a different form of advocacy. In either case, the enduring challenge is to ensure that choices are guided by long-term aspirations rather than short-term pressures.

The journey ahead is likely to remain complex. Yet history suggests that societies which remain organised, reflective, and principled are better positioned to shape their destiny—whatever form that destiny may ultimately take.

Timothy Enongene, Guest Editor-in-Chief, The Independentistnews